Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.
Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.
154 P.3d 997; 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471; 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851; 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990; 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.
Opinion
MILLER (Paul)
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.
Supreme Court of California.
Petition for review granted.
The applications to appear as counsel pro hac vice are granted.
CHIN, J., was recused and did not participate.
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.