McLane v. City and County of Denver
McLane v. City and County of Denver
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Daniel D. Domenico
Civil Action No. 20-cv-00044-DDD-NYW
JONATHAN MCLANE, JOHN THOMAS COOPER, JR., and KATIE ETCHEVERRY,
Plaintiffs, v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MICHAEL B. HANCOCK, AMANDA P. SANDOVAL, KEVIN FLYNN, JAMIE TORRES, KEN- DRA BLACK, AMANDA SAWYER, PAUL KASHMANN, JOLON CLARK, CHRISTOPHER HERNDON, CANDI CDEBACA, CHRIS HINDS, STACIE GILMORE, ROBIN KNIECH, DEBORAH ORTEGA, KRISTIN M. BRONSON, MICHAEL J. HYMAN, PAUL PAZEN, BARB ARCHER, RON THOMAS, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the recommendation (Doc. 27) of United States Magistrate Nina Y. Wang that the Court dismiss this case without prej- udice due to Plaintiffs Jonathan McLane, John Thomas Cooper, Jr., and Katie Etcheverry’s failure to prosecute. The recommendation states that objections to the recommendation must be filed within fourteen days af- ter its service on the parties. (Doc. 27 at 5 n.2 (citing
28 U.S.C. § 36(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Griego v. Padilla (In re Griego),
64 F.3d 580, 583(10th Cir. 1995).) The recommendation was served on the par- ties on April 22, 2020 at the addresses they provided to the Court, and no party has objected to the recommendation. In the absence of a timely objection, the Court may review a magis- trate judge’s recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. Summers v. Utah,
927 F.2d 1165, 1167(0th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 150, 154(1985)). In this matter, the Court has re- viewed the recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee Notes. Based on that review, the Court has concluded that the recom- mendation is a correct application of the facts and the law.
Accordingly, itis ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; and the case is hereby DIS- MISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiffs’ failure to pros- ecute and failure to comply with Court orders.
DATED: May 8, 2020 BY THE COURT:
Hon. Daniel D. Domenico
Reference
- Status
- Unknown