IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 19-cv-03487-CMA-NYW

Sean Murtagh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., and LEVTEX HOLDINGS, LLC,

Defendants.

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the July 3, 2020 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 37) Nina Y. Wang, wherein Judge Wang recommends that this Court grant Defendants Bed Bath and Beyond Inc. and Levtex Holdings, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. # 20). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See

(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 37 at 34.) Despite this advisement, no objection to Magistrate Judge Wang’s Recommendation has been filed by either party. “[T]he district court is accorded considerable discretion with respect to the treatment of unchallenged magistrate reports. In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge’s] report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah,

(10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn,

(1985) (stating that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”)). After reviewing the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wang, in addition to applicable portions of the record and relevant legal authority, the Court is satisfied that the Recommendation is sound and not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 37) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of this Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: July 21, 2020

BY THE COURT:

— Wie rn CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge