Adrian Salazar v. Londonburg, Captain, Denise Brewer, Nurse, Melissa Rogers,...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 25-cv-01835-PAB-NRN ADRIAN SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. LONDONBURG, Captain, DENISE BREWER, Nurse, MELISSA ROGERS, Provider, PAMALA DANG, Nursing Supervisor, ROSALINDA VASQUEZ, Nurse, JANET GREEN, Nurse, OCHOA, Doctor, CHASIN, Correctional Officer, and NATHAN BENNION, Provider, Defendants.

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation on CDOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 51]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. Docket No. 51 at 9-10; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on April 16, 2026. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.”' Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation on CDOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 51] is ACCEPTED. It is further ORDERED that CDOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 23] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that defendants Londonburg, Rosalinda Vasquez, Janet Green, Chasin, Pamala Dang, and Nathan Bennion are dismissed from this case.?

DATED May 5, 2026.

BY THE COURT: PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge ' This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous” or “contrary to law” standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). ? According to the CDOC Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Docket No. 23 at 1, the correct spelling of the defendants’ names are Gwendolyn Londenberg, Janet Greene, and Sally Chason.