McKienzie v. McMillen
McKienzie v. McMillen
Opinion of the Court
This was a suit upon a promissory note payable to Mrs. Marie Conolly, for the sum of $300, with
Appellants’ contention is that the note was first indorsed to McMillen Bros., and subsequently this indorsement was erased, and the name of Neil McMillen substituted, after suit was brought, without the knowledge or consent of the payee. There is not a particle of proof to support this position, and ample evidence to warrant the findings and judgment of the court. Judgment should be affirmed.
Pattison and Reed, CO., concur.
For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- McKenzie v. McMillen
- Status
- Published