Supreme Court of Colorado, 1895

Phillips v. Rhodes

Phillips v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided April 15, 1895
21 Colo. 217

Counsel

Mr. L. Walker,, for plaintiff in error., Mr. E. B. Kellogg, Messrs. Marsh, Voorhees & Marsh, Mr. H. E. Luthe and Mr. W. W. Cooke, for defendants in error.

Phillips v. Rhodes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This suit was instituted to set aside certain conveyances of real estate. The history of the transaction is succinctly set forth in the statement preceding the opinion of the court of appeals in Phillips v. Rhodes et al., 2 Colo. App. 70.

The opinion of that court answers every proposition of law or fact necessarily involved in the action. A.t best, the cause of plaintiff in error rests upon disputed questions of fact, which were determined against him at the trial upon conflicting evidence. It would be contrary to the well established practice for this court to disturb the findings of the trial court under these circumstances. For this reason, in addition to those assigned by the court of appeals, the judgment of that court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.