Mosher v. Lustick
Mosher v. Lustick
66 Colo. 455
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of Denver (Colo. 1954)
- Kinney v. Yoelin Bros. Mercantile Co. (Colo. 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The defendant in error moves to strike the bill of exceptions, on the ground that it was not filed in time. It was filed within an extension of time, but there was no notice of motion for extension. The motion to strike must be granted.
In re Luthe’s Will, Ransom v. Holland,, No. 9546, decided herewith. 66 Colo. 420.
Motion to strike bill of exceptions granted.
Garrigues, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.