McDonald v. Pingrey Mines & Ore Reduction Co.
McDonald v. Pingrey Mines & Ore Reduction Co.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is conceded that the evidence was conflicting. The principal contention of plaintiffs in error is to the effect that the court’s finding for the defendants was manifestly against the weight of the evidence. On review of the evidence, as set forth in the abstract, we cannot sustain this contention. It follows that the judgment must be, and it accordingly is, affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Teller and Mr. Justice Burke concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- McDonald v. Pingrey Mines and Ore Reduction Co.
- Status
- Published