Supreme Court of Colorado, 1932

Craddock v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided February 15, 1932 · Opinion Per Curiam.

8 P.2d 1112; 90 Colo. 284; 1932 Colo. LEXIS 243 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Ferguson v. Rockwell International Corp. (Colo. App. 1986)
Craddock v. Palmer (Colo. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.