In re Interrogatories of the Senate
In re Interrogatories of the Senate
67 P.2d 1038; 100 Colo. 342; 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Conklin v. Armstrong (Colo. 1940)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Interrogatory 1. Hoes House Bill No. 379 and particularly section 20 thereof conflict with section 2 (a) of Amendment No. 4 to the Constitution, “The Old Age Pension Amendment? ’’
The answer is No.
In view of our answer to interrogatory No. 1, answer to the second interrogatory is unnecessary.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.