Supreme Court of Colorado, 1938

Noffsinger v. Thompson

Noffsinger v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided March 21, 1938 · Hilliard
102 Colo. 161

Noffsinger v. Thompson

Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Hilliard

dissenting.

I did not participate in the original consideration of the case, but on rehearing I heard the oral argument and have examined the record. The court is now, as it was at the earlier determination, of opinion that the judgment at trial was based on findings resolved on conflicting evidence; that points of law are not involved, and that a written opinion would serve no useful purpose. Although on the merits of the controversy I am not in accord with the court, and dissent to the order of general affirmance, I agree to the informal disposition which the court has made of the matter.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion. Mr. Justice Bakke not participating. Mr. Justice Hilliard dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.