Oestereick v. Roper
Oestereick v. Roper
122 Colo. 59; 220 P.2d 551; 1950 Colo. LEXIS 214
Oestereick v. Roper
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Stone did not participate in the consideration of this cause. Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Hays and Mr. Justice Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Holland think that it should be reversed. The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no good purpose would be
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.