Conner v. Tinsley
Conner v. Tinsley
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Plaintiff in error sought a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court on the ground that he having been convicted of forgery was sentenced to the state penitentiary for not less than eight nor more than fifteen years whereas C.R.S. ’53, 40-6-1 provides that the sentence which may be imposed is “* * * not less than one year nor more than fourteen years” in the Colorado State Penitentiary.
There being no final judgment on the writ of habeas corpus and no record before this court to review, the writ of error is dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.