Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America (Colo. 1989)
- Armed Forces Bank, N.A. v. Hicks (Colo. App. 2014)
- Hoang v. Monterra Homes (Powderhorn) LLC (Colo. App. 2006)
- Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellee (10th Cir. 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This case has been heard and reviewed by the court. Chief Justice Quinn, Justice Rovira, and Justice Vollaek favor affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Bartlett v. Continental Divide Insurance Co., 697 P.2d 412 (Colo.App. 1984). Justice Erickson, Justice Lohr, and Justice Kirshbaum are in favor of reversal. Justice Dubofsky does not participate.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court. C.A.R. 35(e).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.