State Engineer v. EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
State Engineer v. EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
Opinion
AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.
Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Susan S. Schneider, Assistant Attorney General, Natu *1029 ral Resources and Environment Section, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for The State Engineer; Division Engineer for Water Division 5; and The Colorado Water Conservation Board.
Trout, Witwer & Freeman, P.C., Robert V. Trout, Douglas M. Sinor, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District.
Porzak, Browning & Bushong, LLP, Glenn E. Porzak, Steven J. Bushong, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Applicant-Appellee.
Trout Unlimited, Andrew Peternell, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Opposer-Appel-lee Trout Unlimited.
Since the court is equally divided, the judgments of District Court, Water Division 5 are affirmed by operation of law. CAR. 85(e).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. the STATE ENGINEER; Division Engineer for Water Division 5; The Colorado Water Conservation Board; Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District; And Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Opposers-Appellants, v. EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, Applicant-Appellee; Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Breckenridge in Summit County. the State Engineer; Division Engineer for Water Division 5; And the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Opposers-Appellants, v. the Town of Breckenridge, Applicant-Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published