Supreme Court of Colorado, 2003

State Engineer v. EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT

Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided May 19, 2003 · Mullarkey, Martinez, Bender, Water, Kourlis, Rice, Coats, Hobbs

69 P.3d 1028; 2003 WL 21136730 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.

Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Susan S. Schneider, Assistant Attorney General, Natu *1029 ral Resources and Environment Section, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for The State Engineer; Division Engineer for Water Division 5; and The Colorado Water Conservation Board.

Trout, Witwer & Freeman, P.C., Robert V. Trout, Douglas M. Sinor, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District.

Porzak, Browning & Bushong, LLP, Glenn E. Porzak, Steven J. Bushong, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Applicant-Appellee.

Trout Unlimited, Andrew Peternell, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Opposer-Appel-lee Trout Unlimited.

Chief Justice MULLARKEY, Justice MARTINEZ, and Justice BENDER are of the opinion that the judgments of District Court, Water Division 5 should be affirmed, whereas Justice KOURLIS, Justice RICE and Justice COATS are of the opinion that they should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the judgments of District Court, Water Division 5 are affirmed by operation of law. CAR. 85(e).

Justice HOBBS does not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.