Supreme Court of Colorado, 2018

Rose v. Brackney (In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for Proposed Initiatives 2017-2018 178, 179, 180 & 181 "Regulation of Oil & Gas Dev.")

Rose v. Brackney (In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for Proposed Initiatives 2017-2018 178, 179, 180 & 181 "Regulation of Oil & Gas Dev.")
Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided July 2, 2018
421 P.3d 173 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Attorneys for Petitioner: Tierney Lawrence LLC, Edward T. Ramey, Martha M. Tierney, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondents: Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Jason R. Dunn, David B. Meschke, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for the Title Board: Cynthia H. Coffman, Attorney General, Matthew D. Grove, Assistant Solicitor General, Denver, Colorado

Rose v. Brackney (In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for Proposed Initiatives 2017-2018 178, 179, 180 & 181 "Regulation of Oil & Gas Dev.")

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

*174¶1 Chief Justice Coats, Justice Márquez, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that the action of the Title Board should be affirmed.

¶2 Justice Hood, Justice Gabriel and Justice Hart are of the opinion that the action of the Title Board should be reversed.

¶3 The action of the Title Board setting a title for ballot initiatives numbered 2017-2018 #178, #179, #180, and #181 is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.