Supreme Court of Colorado, 2026

The People of the State of Colorado and the Guardian ad Litem v. R.J.F., Father In the Interest of S.K.F., Y.Y.F., and A.N.F., Children

The People of the State of Colorado and the Guardian ad Litem v. R.J.F., Father In the Interest of S.K.F., Y.Y.F., and A.N.F., Children
Supreme Court of Colorado · Decided June 23, 2026
The People of the State of Colorado and the Guardian ad Litem v. R.J.F., Father In the Interest of S.K.F., Y.Y.F., and A.N.F., Children

Opinion

1

The People of the State of Colorado and the Guardian ad Litem In the Interest of S.K.F., Y.Y.F., and A.N.F., Children Petitioners v. R.J.F., Father Respondent

No. 26SC177

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc

June 23, 2026

Court of Appeals Case No. 25CA206

Petitions for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.

Whether the court of appeals erred in finding that the El Paso County Department (the "Department") restricted family time without a court order and thereby did not make reasonable efforts.

[REFRAMED] Whether the court of appeals erred in failing to apply the clearly erroneous standard of review to the lower court's finding that reasonable efforts were made.

[REFRAMED] Whether the court of appeals erred in construing section 19-3-217, C.R.S. (2025) as being dispositive of whether reasonable efforts were made in this case.

DENIED AS TO ALL OTHER ISSUES.

Opinion

1

The People of the State of Colorado and the Guardian ad Litem

In the Interest of S.K.F., Y.Y.F., and A.N.F., Children Petitioners
v.
R.J.F., Father Respondent

No. 26SC177

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc

June 23, 2026


          Court of Appeals Case No. 25CA206

         Petitions for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.

         Whether the court of appeals erred in finding that the El Paso County Department (the "Department") restricted family time without a court order and thereby did not make reasonable efforts.

         [REFRAMED] Whether the court of appeals erred in failing to apply the clearly erroneous standard of review to the lower court's finding that reasonable efforts were made.

         [REFRAMED] Whether the court of appeals erred in construing section 19-3-217, C.R.S. (2025) as being dispositive of whether reasonable efforts were made in this case.

DENIED AS TO ALL OTHER ISSUES.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.