Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1963

State v. Vasel

State v. Vasel
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided February 28, 1963 · Dearington, Jacobs, Kinmonth
1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 573

State v. Vasel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes §14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that *574the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence.

There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Eule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

There is no error.

Kinmonth, Dearington and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.