Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1963

State v. Vasel

State v. Vasel
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided February 28, 1963
24 Conn. Supp. 319

State v. Vasel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes §14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence.

*320There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Eule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Eule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Eule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

There is no error.

Kinmonth, Dearington and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.