Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1984

Vitale v. Natalino

Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided May 10, 1984 · Dannehy, Hull, Spallone

478 A.2d 270; 2 Conn. App. 345 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff 1 filed this appeal 2 following a trial in which the jury found against the plaintiffs on each of the five counts in their complaint.

The parties did not appear for oral argument, but stipulated that the court may rule on the basis of the record and briefs. After a careful study of the record and briefs of those issues properly before this court, we conclude that there is no merit to the plaintiffs claims.

There is no error.

The original suit included both Louis Vitale and Andres Rodriguez as the plaintiffs. Rodriguez was nonsuited and failed to appeal the nonsuit. For the purposes of this appeal, Vitale is the sole plaintiff.

This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.