Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1985

Linden Shore District v. Johnson

Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided June 11, 1985

4 Conn. App. 225; 493 A.2d 901

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Perlmutter v. Johnson (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and have closely examined the file and briefs1 in this case. We find nothing to substantiate the named defendant’s claims of error.

There is no error, but the case must be remanded with direction to modify the judgment by fixing new law days.

During the course of the appeal, we denied the plaintiffs motion to strike the brief of the named defendant, without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew its motion at the time of oral argument. The plaintiff renewed its motion. We again deny it.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.