Linden Shore District v. Johnson

Connecticut Court of Appeals June 11, 1985

Linden Shore District v. Johnson, 4 Conn. App. 225 (1985)

493 A.2d 901

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and have closely examined the file and briefs1 in this case. We find nothing to substantiate the named defendant’s claims of error.

There is no error, but the case must be remanded with direction to modify the judgment by fixing new law days.

During the course of the appeal, we denied the plaintiffs motion to strike the brief of the named defendant, without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew its motion at the time of oral argument. The plaintiff renewed its motion. We again deny it.

Reference

Full Case Name: Linden Shore District v. Carol C. Johnson
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published