Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Culpeper
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. (Conn. App. Ct. 2006)
- Hughes v. Budny, No. Cv 96 0070449 (Nov. 18, 1996) (Connecticut Superior Court 1996)
- Matey v. City of Waterbury (Conn. App. Ct. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The commissioner of revenue services appealed to the Superior Court from an order and decree of the Norwalk Probate Court finding that no succession tax was due to the state of Connecticut from the estate of Daphne Culpeper (estate). In his reasons of appeal, the commissioner stated that the decedent left the residue of her estate to an alleged charitable foundation to be formed after her death. Inasmuch as the charitable foundation was not structured within five years after her death as required by General Statutes § 12-347, the commissioner claimed that the estate is liable for succession taxes in an amount exceeding one million dollars.
Kalman Nulman and Joseph Weill (the applicants), are former co-executors of the estate, who were removed because of their alleged failure timely to form
Subsequent to oral argument of this appeal, we learned that the Superior Court case in which the applicants sought to intervene has been withdrawn.
The appeal is dismissed.
The commissioner’s withdrawal was filed on May 2,1985, in Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Daphne Culpeper, Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk, No. 83 0064 322S.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.