Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1986

Ramos v. Cohn

Ramos v. Cohn
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 1986
7 Conn. App. 549; 508 A.2d 848; 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 996

Ramos v. Cohn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In this action on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. He claims that the court erred in denying his motion to amend his pleadings shortly *550before trial. We have fully considered the arguments of the defendant and find that he has not established that the court abused its discretion.

There is no error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.