Jepsen v. Macri
Jepsen v. Macri
14 Conn. App. 803; 539 A.2d 1042
Jepsen v. Macri
Opinion of the Court
We have fully considered the claims of the defendants and find them to be without merit. The only claim which warrants further discussion is that of the named defendant that she could not be held civilly liable because of insanity. This claim is controlled by Polmatier v. Russ, 206 Conn. 229, 537 A.2d 468 (1988).
There is no error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.