Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1988

DiBlasi v. Brown

DiBlasi v. Brown
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided November 7, 1988
17 Conn. App. 803; 550 A.2d 899; 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 450

DiBlasi v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant Carol Russo’s claims of error implicate the fact finding function of the trial *804court. We will not retry the case. Our review fails to disclose that the factual findings of the court were clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record, or that the decision was otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book § 4061.

There is no error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.