Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1989

Messenger v. Messenger

Messenger v. Messenger
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided June 1, 1989
18 Conn. App. 825; 559 A.2d 1193; 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 200

Messenger v. Messenger

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered each of the defendant’s claims of error including a plenary review of the record, transcript and briefs of the parties. As the appellant, the defendant has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Janet v. Scarpetti, 17 Conn. App. 825, 552 A.2d 1225 (1989); Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986); B. Holden & J. Daly, Connecticut Evidence § 60. After affording the claims of error the appropriate, scope of review, we conclude that the defendant has not met her burden.

There is no error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.