Schmid v. Doerrer
Schmid v. Doerrer
26 Conn. App. 919; 599 A.2d 404; 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 417
Schmid v. Doerrer
Opinion of the Court
Our review of the record, briefs and oral argument convinces us that the conclusions reached by the attorney trial referee and accepted by the trial court are more than adequately supported by the subordinate facts found. Clark v. Drska, 1 Conn. App. 481, 484-85, 473 A.2d 325 (1984).
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.