Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1996

Suprenant v. Kuhn

Suprenant v. Kuhn
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided March 26, 1996
40 Conn. App. 751; 673 A.2d 585; 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 156

Suprenant v. Kuhn

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiffs awarding $2500 damages. They claim that the trial court improperly based its decision on an issue not raised in the pleadings, and abused its discretion in making certain findings. The defendants have failed to present a written memorandum of decision or a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the court explaining the factual basis for its decision. See Practice Book § 4059. We have consistently stated that it is the responsibility of the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. Practice Book § 4061; Gelormino v. Blaustein, 31 Conn. App. 750, 751, 626 A.2d 1325 (1993); State v. Rios, 30 Conn. App. 712, 715, 622 A.2d 618 (1993).

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.