Connecticut Court of Appeals, 1996

Milardo v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided June 18, 1996

41 Conn. App. 749; 677 A.2d 24; 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 301

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Francis v. Commissioner of Correction (Conn. App. Ct. 1999)
Marra v. Commissioner of Correction (Conn. App. Ct. 1998)
Hart v. Commissioner of Correction (Conn. App. Ct. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After a review of the record and briefs, and after hearing from the parties at oral argument, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a state or federal constitutional right and, further, has failed to sustain his burden of persuasion that the denial of certification to appeal was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice has been done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 612, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Simms v. Warden, 229 Conn. 178, 179, 640 A.2d 601 (1994); Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, 38 Conn. App. 99, 99-*750100, 659 A.2d 195 (1995); see also Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991).

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.