Connecticut Court of Appeals, 2001

Webster Bank v. Zak

Webster Bank v. Zak
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided January 16, 2001
61 Conn. App. 402; 763 A.2d 1090; 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 23
Webster Bank v. Zak

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court in this case must be reversed and the case remanded for the purpose of making factual findings to determine whether the defendant MFR of East Hampton, LLC, has standing to assert its claim to an interest in the property under foreclosure and to otherwise participate in the proceedings. We retain jurisdiction over this appeal for purposes of any further appellate proceedings, without the necessity of filing another appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.