State v. Matute
State v. Matute
Opinion of the Court
Opinion
This is an appeal by the state following the granting by the trial court of the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) and to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea entered pursuant to the Alford doctrine.
The decision of the trial court allowing the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to deny the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction.
See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970).
General Statutes § 54-lj provides: “(a) The court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere from any defendant in any criminal proceeding unless the court advises him of the following: ‘If you are not a citizen of the United States, you are hereby advised that conviction of the offense for which you have been charged may have the consequences of deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturalization, pursuant to the laws of the United States.’
“(b) The defendant shall not be required at the time of the plea to disclose his legal status in the United States to the court.
“(c) If the court fails to advise a defendant as required in subsection (a) of this section and the defendant not later than three years after the acceptance of the plea shows that his plea and conviction may have one of the enumerated consequences, the court, on the defendant’s motion, shall vacate the judgment, and permit the defendant to withdraw the plea of guilty or nolo contendere, and enter a plea of not guilty.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.