Connecticut Court of Appeals, 2001

State v. Ibrahim

State v. Ibrahim
Connecticut Court of Appeals · Decided April 10, 2001
62 Conn. App. 634; 772 A.2d 680; 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174

State v. Ibrahim

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Khalid Ibrahim, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c and kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A). The defendant’s claims are virtually identical to the claims raised in State v. Vicente, 62 Conn. App. 625, 772 A.2d 643 (2001).1 We, therefore, dispose of the claims here in the same fashion and for the same reasons as in State v. Vicente, supra, 625.

The judgment is affirmed.

The briefs of the defendants in both cases are also virtually identical.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.