Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Connecticut /Cases /Connecticut Federal Courts /United States District Court for the District of Connecticut /

1939

24 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut opinions from 1939.

  • Dysart v. Remington Rand, Inc. 31 F. Supp. 296, (1939)
  • In re New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. 30 F. Supp. 541, (1939)
  • Chappell & Co. v. Santangelo 30 F. Supp. 599, (1939)
  • Ford v. C. E. Wilson & Co. 30 F. Supp. 163, (1939)
  • Thompson v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. 30 F. Supp. 624, (1939)
  • United States Trust Co. of New York v. Sears 29 F. Supp. 643, (1939)
  • Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation 34 F. Supp. 124, (1939)
  • Automatic Devices Corp. v. Cuno Engineering Corp. 34 F. Supp. 144, (1939)
  • In re Gould 31 F. Supp. 793, (1939)
  • Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation 29 F. Supp. 112, (1939)
  • Bender v. Connor 28 F. Supp. 903, (1939)
  • Phoenix State Bank & Trust Co. v. Bitgood 28 F. Supp. 899, (1939)
  • United States v. Pizzarusso 28 F. Supp. 158, (1939)
  • Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation 27 F. Supp. 946, (1939)
  • Gumbart v. Waterbury Club HoldIng Corp. 28 F. Supp. 170, (1939)
  • Stanley Works v. C. S. Mersick & Co. 1 F.R.D. 43, (1939)
  • Federal Housing Administrator v. Christianson 26 F. Supp. 419, (1939)
  • Hammond-Knowlton v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. of Hartford, Conn. 26 F. Supp. 292, (1939)
  • Parrot Speed Fastener Corp. v. E. W. Carpenter Mfg. Co. 26 F. Supp. 622, (1939)
  • Hobart Mfg. Co. v. Landers, Frary & Clark 26 F. Supp. 198, (1939)
  • Gauvin v. Smith 26 F. Supp. 194, (1939)
  • Blakeslee v. Smith 26 F. Supp. 28, (1939)
  • Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp. 26 F. Supp. 418, (1939)
  • In re NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. Co. 26 F. Supp. 18, (1939)

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑