Lucia v. Saul

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut

Lucia v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

TINA LUCIA, Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-01730 (SRU)

v.

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING COMMISSIONER’S CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WITH REVERSAL AND REMAND

The defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, has moved to enter judgment under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g), with a reversal and remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further action. See Doc. No. 20. Counsel for the Commissioner represents that he has contacted counsel for the plaintiff who consents to the relief sought in the motion. Under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g), I have the authority to enter a judgment with a reversal and remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

509 U.S. 292, 297

(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89, 98

(1991). Remand for further development of the record is appropriate when gaps exist in the administrative record or when the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) committed legal error. See Parker v. Harris,

626 F.2d 225, 235

(2d Cir. 1980). Here, the Commissioner has determined that a remand of the case for additional administrative proceedings is necessary. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will affirm the finding of disability beginning December 8, 2018, with respect to the application for supplemental security income under Title XVI. With respect to the application for disability insurance benefits under Title II, the agency will address the borderline age issue in compliance with HALLEX I-2-2-42; reassess the Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; further consider which Medical-Vocational guidelines apply; and, if warranted, obtain supplement evidence from a vocational expert. Accordingly, I GRANT the Commissioner’s Consent Motion for Entry of

Judgment Under Sentence Four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). The Clerk shall enter a judgment of reversal and remand under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g), and shall remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the motion. So ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 22nd day of June 2021.

/s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown