Marcheterre v. Kijakazi

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut

Marcheterre v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

------------------------------x : TRACIE L. M. : Civ. No. 3:20CV01898(SALM) : v. : : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, : ACTING COMMISSIONER, : SOCIAL SECURITY : October 21, 2021 ADMINISTRATION1 : : ------------------------------x

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF

42 U.S.C. §405

(g) WITH REVERSAL AND REMAND OF THE CAUSE TO THE DEFENDANT

Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of

42 U.S.C. §405

(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Defendant [Doc. #21] is GRANTED. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with or without remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §405

(g), and in light of defendant’s unopposed request to remand this action for further administrative proceedings, it is ordered that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner.

1 Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 9, 2021. She is now the proper defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d);

42 U.S.C. §405

(g). The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. 1 Upon remand, the Appeals Council is directed to affirm the favorable period beginning January 1, 2020, and remand the prior period to an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ is directed to (1) give further consideration to the medical opinion evidence pursuant to

20 C.F.R. §404.1527

; (2) further evaluate plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, particularly her ability to handle, finger, and engage in repetitive movements with the right upper extremity; (3) if warranted, obtain supplemental vocational evidence; (4) offer a new

hearing; (5) complete the administrative record; and (6) issue a new decision. Therefore, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. §405

(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

509 U.S. 292

(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89

(1991). The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. SO ORDERED at New Haven, Connecticut this 21st day of October, 2021.

___/s/______________________ HON. SARAH A. L. MERRIAM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Reference

Status
Unknown