Connecticut Superior Court, 1783

Fitch v. Lothrop

Fitch v. Lothrop
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided December 15, 1783
1 Root 88
Fitch v. Lothrop

Opinion of the Court

To this declaration the defendants demur — And the following exceptions were taken; 1st. That a bondsman is not liable; unless the administrator has committed a devastavit, and in some point been deficient in his duty; and that this ought to appear from the declaration. 2d. The averment is that the defendants have never performed the conditions of said bond; which is a negative pregnant, for the administrator may have performed the conditions; although the defendants have not. Judgment that the declaration is insufficient.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.