Connecticut Superior Court, 1786

Mason v. Mason

Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 15, 1786 · Absentibus, Law, Sherman

2 Kirby 18; 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 18

Opinion of the Court

ACTION of account.—The defendant gave a general plea; he then took it back and agreed to the appointment of auditors. A question arose whether it would be regular to suffer a default and then move for auditors.

The Court were inclined that it would be regular, for there must be an interlocutory judgement before auditors can be appointed, which may well be on default.—

(Absentibus C.: Judge Law and Judge Sherman.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.