Connecticut Superior Court, 1807

President of Hartford Bank v. Hart

President of Hartford Bank v. Hart
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided February 15, 1807 · Thk
3 Day 491

Counsel

Daggett, Perkins, Mosely and Root, for the plaintiffs., Jngersoll, Goodrich, R. Griswold and N. Terry, for the defendant., Daggett, contra,, Daggett objected to this evidence., Ingersoll and Terry, contra,, Daggett, in reply.

President of Hartford Bank v. Hart

Opinion of the Court

By thk Court.

It is clear, that the doings of a corporation can be known only by its corporate acts, The confessions of individual members cannot be received. Though the directors have certain powers, resulting from their act of incorporation, and are, for certain purposes, agents; and though their acts, when in strict relation to their agency, are binding en the corporation; yet, as to the matters attempted to be proved, it does not appear that they were agents. The evidence is, therefore, inadmissible.(a)

Vide Head et al v. Providence Insurance Company, 2 Crunch, 137. Scatty v. Marine Insurance Company, 2 Johns. 114.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.