Connecticut Superior Court, 1935

Atchison v. Town of Newtown

Atchison v. Town of Newtown
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 20, 1935 · Hon, Baldwin
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 97; 3 Conn. Supp. 97; 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 127

Counsel

Lazarus Heyman, Attorney for the Plaintiff. J. H. Symonds, Attorney for the Defendant.

Atchison v. Town of Newtown

Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, J.

The complaint as amended sets up a cause of action based upon a tax laid upon an assessment which assessment it is alleged “was manifestly excessive and could not have been arrived at except by disregarding the provision of the statute for determining the valuation of such property.”

Sec. 328b, Cum. Sup. 1933, now Sec. 375c, Cum. Sup. 1935, formerly Sec. 1201, G. S.

The defendant demurs upon the ground that it is not alleged and it does not appear in the amended complaint that the tax has not been paid.

The prayer for relief is that the valuation of the assessed property be reduced to its actual fair valuation.

The action is not brought to restrain the collection of a claimed illegal tax, and an allegation that the tax has not been paid would be immaterial to a determination of the grievance plaintiffs claim relief from. The complaint as now amended sets up a cause of action under the statute herein-before referred to.

“The demurrer being addressed to the substance of the complaint, if any facts which are provable under its allegations would support the cause of action relied upon, the demurrer would of necessity fail.”
Cashman vs. Meriden Hospital, 117 Conn. 585, 586, 169 Atl. 915; Blakeslee vs. Water Commissioners, 106 Conn. 642, 649 139, Atl. 106.; Mathews vs. Converse, 83 Conn. 511, 515, 77 Atl. 961; Wildman, 72 Conn. 262, 270, 44 Atl. 224; O’Donnell vs. Sargent, 69 Conn. 476, 483, 38 Atl. 216.

The demurrer is overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.