Connecticut Superior Court, 1935

Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided March 19, 1935 · Baldwin
1 Conn. Supp. 88; 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 38

Counsel

Henry Greenstein, Attorney for the Plaintiff., Pullman & Comley, Attorneys for the Defendant.

Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiff moves that the defendant be

required to make its second and third defenses more specific “by stating more particularly in what paragraph or paragraphs of the complaint are contained the cause of action as to which” each such defense is interposed.

It is apparent upon a reading of the complaint and these defenses that neither defense is addressed to any particular paragraph or paragraphs. These defenses are each addressed to the cause of action itself which is set up in the complaint as a whole and not to a specific paragraph or paragraphs.

If the plaintiff thinks that neither defense is good, he may test such question by demurrer.

The motion is denied

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.