Connecticut Superior Court, 1936

Kenney v. Blakeslee

Kenney v. Blakeslee
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 6, 1936 · Simpson
3 Conn. Supp. 447; 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 68

Counsel

F. Coeller, Attorney for the Plaintiff., C. F. Bollman, Attorney for the Defendant.

Kenney v. Blakeslee

Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, J.

The Plea in Abatement is sustained on the authority of Mattoon’s Appeal, 79 Conn. 86. While this may not be in keeping, in principle, with cases permitting the joinder of parties as defendants to prevent a multiplicity of suits, it must be remembered that this is purely a statutory proceeding, and as long as the statute remains the same, the reasoning in the Mattoon case will have to be followed.

The Plea in Abatement is therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.