Connecticut Superior Court, 1936

In re K-B Sales Co.

In re K-B Sales Co.
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided May 20, 1936 · Jennings
4 Conn. Supp. 45; 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 90

Counsel

John Chatfield, Attorney for the Petitioner.

In re K-B Sales Co.

Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, J.

Taxes do not "seem to be entitled to preference by any general law of this State. There is considerable authority for the proposition that in the absence of statutory authority such preference does not exist. 61 C. J. 925. That Connecticut would follow this rule seems indicated by the fact that they are often postponed to other claims. See G. S. 4870 and 4937. From G. S. 4853 and 5939 it is very apparent that wages of the type described are given a distinct preference. The petitioners are advised to pay the preferred wage claims pro rata. I understand this will exhaust the assets.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.