Connecticut Superior Court, 1936

Whitlock v. Beecher

Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 16, 1936 · Dickenson

4 Conn. Supp. 313; 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 199

Counsel

Carl A. Mears, Attorney for the Plaintiff., Thomas J. Ryan, Attorney for the Defendant.

Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, J.

Plaintiff asks for a disclosure of defense. The defendant claims his motion for a more specific statement not having been answered he should not be compelled to disclose.

*314The two are independent of one another and no motion for a judgment of nonsuit has been made for failure to answer the motion for a more specific statement.

The instant motion is granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.