Connecticut Superior Court, 1937

Proctor v. Weigold

Proctor v. Weigold
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 27, 1937 · Jennings
5 Conn. Supp. 73; 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 50

Counsel

Louis M. Altman, Attorney for the Plaintiffs., Walsh 6? Buckley, Attorneys for the Defendants.

Proctor v. Weigold

Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, J.

To the original complaints sounding in negligence, the plaintiff seeks to add by amendment a second count. The proposed amendment prays for the setting aside of a conveyance for fraud on the plaintiff. The propriety of including such a count in this suit is questioned by the defendants. This raises an issue of law which may not be decided on a motion to amend but should be squarely raised by demurrer.

Newman vs. Golden, 108 Conn. 676, 679.

Smith vs. Furness, 117 Conn. 97, 100.

The motions to amend are granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.