Connecticut Superior Court, 1938

Cimoch v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.

Cimoch v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided May 21, 1938 · Cornell
6 Conn. Super. Ct. 368; 6 Conn. Supp. 368; 1938 Conn. Super. LEXIS 137

Counsel

Jacob Bresnerkoff; Butler, Howard & Campbell, of Hartford, for the Plaintiff., Pond, Morgan & Morse, of New Haven; Woodhouse & Schofield, of Hartford, for the Defendant.

Cimoch v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.

Opinion of the Court

CORNELL, J.

The first count seeks to predicate liability under the statute on defendant’s part for failure to adequately light a rear porch of a tenement house which forms part of a common passageway connected by stairs leading from the third floor to the ground.

The statute in question (Gen. Stat. [1930] §2566) provides that: “The owner of each tenement house shall provide for the lighting of all public halls at night.” Section 2562 defines a “public hall” as that term is employed in section 2566, supra, as meaning, • “a hall, corridor or passageway not within an apartment.” It thus fails to limit the application of the term to means of passing within a tenement building, but extends it to all passageways which are for the common use of tenants or others lawfully upon them. Such all-embracing language would seem to be inclusive of exterior as well as interior passageways and so it cannot be held that the plaintiff may not be .able to establish a cause of action within the allegations of the first count.

Demurrer overruled on both grounds.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.