Connecticut Superior Court, 1940

Morrison v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co.

Morrison v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co.
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided January 2, 1940 · Comley
8 Conn. Supp. 11; 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 15

Counsel

Saltman & Weiss, of Bridgeport, for the Plaintiff., William H. Leete, of Hartford; Francis A. Pallotti, Attorney General, and Harry Silverstone, Assistant Attorney General, for the Defendants.

Morrison v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co.

Opinion of the Court

COMLEY, J.

The commissioner’s award turns on a difference between the striker whose unemployment begins with the stoppage of work as a result of the labor dispute and the striker whose unemployment had commenced a few days before the strike. Such a distinction opens, up a wide field of speculation. It seems to me equally within the language of the statute and.more in harmony with its professed purpose to hold that the unemployment status of a striker is suspended during a strike promoted by him and is restored if the termination of the dispute leaves him without employment.

The appellant has no cause to complain of the award and his-appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.