Connecticut Superior Court, 1940

F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. Pausch

F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. Pausch
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided July 16, 1940 · Quinlan
8 Conn. Supp. 402; 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 140

Counsel

Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff., Slade, Slade & Slade, of New Haven, for the Defendants.

F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. Pausch

Opinion of the Court

QUINLAN, J.

The demurrer to a lone paragraph, viz;., paragraph 6, which does not of itself attempt to state a cause of action, is improperly pleaded. Practice Book (1934) §97.

So far as the demurrer to the prayer for relief is concerned, the more specific statement in conjunction with paragraph 6 adequately states a cause upon which such relief could be predicated. See, however, form 249 in connection with form 250, Practice Book (1934) pp. 215, 216.

In its present form, as to subdivision I of the demurrer, and at the present time, in view of such allegations as do ap' pear as to subdivision II, the demurrer is. overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.