Connecticut Superior Court, 1940

Finn v. Kiernan

Finn v. Kiernan
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided December 13, 1940 · Munger
9 Conn. Supp. 70; 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 207

Counsel

Robert J. Woodruff, and Arthur Klein, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff., David M. Reilly, of New Haven, for the Defendant.

Finn v. Kiernan

Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, J.

The plaintiff moves for a default for failure to file answer. The defendant is not in default. The motion of the plaintiff for leave to amend was granted January 12, 1940, but no amendment has been filed.

The position of the defendant is technically correct.

β€œThe granting of a motion to amend does not in itself constitute an amendment.” Motiejaitis vs. Johnson, 117 Conn. 631, 638.

Motion for default denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.