Wickes Mfg. Co. v. Currier Elec. Co., No. Cv 83 0064392 S (Oct. 24, 1990)
Opinion of the Court
The first is by both defendants, Currier Electric Co., Inc., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USFG), and concerns whether the original plaintiff, Eagle Signal Corporation, had the right to bring suit in its own name, and, secondly, whether it was proper to thereafter substitute Wickes Manufacturing Company (Wickes) as the named plaintiff. I do not believe any further articulation is required. as footnote 1 on page 1 of the decision explains why the motion to substitute Wickes as plaintiff was granted, and therefore the motion to articulate in this regard is denied.
The second request is from defendant USFG alone and requests an addition to the memorandum of decision concerning whether the plaintiff properly pled a cause of action against it pursuant to General Statutes S
Dated at Stamford, Connecticut this day of October, CT Page 2795 1990.
WILLIAM B. LEWIS, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.